669
UNKNOWN
November, 1974, survey of New-Protocol Telnet servers
Authors: D.W. Dodds
Date: December 1974
Stream: Legacy
Abstract
An earlier poll of Telnet server implementation status. Updates RFC 702; see also RFCs 703 and 679.
RFC 669
UNKNOWN
Updated by: 679
Network Working Group D.W. Dodds
Request for Comments: 669 BBN-TENEXA
NIC: 31435 December 4, 1974
<span class="h1">November, 1974, Survey of New-Protocol TELNET Servers</span>
Two months have elapsed since our last survey, and the appearance of
additional New-Protocol servers has progressed at the usual snail's
pace. The changes in this list are (with host numbers in octal):
SRI-AI (102) now has a New-Protocol server;
SDC-LAB (10) is back on the net and the list;
SDC-CC (110) is coming on the net but status is as yet unknown;
USC-ISI (126) and USC-ISIB (226) (formerly ISI-DEVTENEX) now have
New-Protocol servers;
SDAC-44 (32) has been removed -- no longer classed as a server host;
HAWAII-500 (344) is coming on the net, status presently unknown;
LONDON (52) has been added;
BBN-TENEXD is now host 162 (formerly 205).
What follows is an update of the summary and tabulation that appeared
in RFC #702.* Is there light at the end of the tunnel?
total server hosts 37 100%
no New-Prot server 19 51%
unknown status (new host) 2 6%
total New-Prot implem. 16 43%
New-Prot on socket 27,
Old on socket 1 (2) 9 24%
New-Prot on 1 and 27 (3) 6 16%
New-Prot on 1 only (3) 1 3%
Notes:
* All data in this report were gathered via a surveying program run
at various times, plus a few manual checks to fill out the data.
What is reported here is the way the various servers work as seen
by the new-Protocol User Telnet at BBNA, as of 4 Dec. 1974.
(2) These are the sites whose operation is 100% correct according to
all protocols and conventions, as I understand them.
(3) We realize that some of the servers that appear here as New-
Protocol servers on socket 1 are actually servers which attempt
to communicate with both Old- and New-Protocol User TELNETs
according to what control sequences are received.
<span class="grey">Dodds [Page 1]</span><span id="page-2" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc669">RFC 669</a> Survey of New-Protocol TELNET Servers December 1974</span>
Tabulation of server status for all server sites:
Host Host Socket Socket New-Prot, Options
No. Name 1 27 Implementation (if any)
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-101" href="#section-101">101</a> UCLA-CCN </span> Old X
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-201" href="#section-201">201</a> UCLA-CCBS </span> Old X
2 SRI-ARC Old X
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-102" href="#section-102">102</a> SRI-AI </span> Old New I1,3,6; O3
3 UCSB-MOD75 Old X
4 UTAH-10 Old X
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-105" href="#section-105">105</a> BBN-TENEX </span> Old New I1,3,6; O3
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-305" href="#section-305">305</a> BBN-TENEXA </span> Old New I1,3,6; O3
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-106" href="#section-106">106</a> MIT-DMS </span> New New I1,3; O3
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-206" href="#section-206">206</a> MIT-AI </span> Old X
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-306" href="#section-306">306</a> MIT-ML </span> Old X
7 RAND-RCC Old X
10 SDC-LAB Old X
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-110" href="#section-110">110</a> SDC-CC </span> ? ?
11 HARV-10 New X I1,3; O3
12 LL-67 Old* X
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-112" href="#section-112">112</a> LL-TX-2 </span> Old X
13 SU-AI New* New* I1,3
15 CASE-10 Old X
16 CMU-10B New New I1,3; O3
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-116" href="#section-116">116</a> CMU-10A </span> New New I1,3; O3
17 I4-TENEX Old X
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-217" href="#section-217">217</a> KI4B-TENEX </span> Old X
20 AMES-67 New New None
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-126" href="#section-126">126</a> USC-ISI </span> Old New I1,3,6; O3
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-226" href="#section-226">226</a> USC-ISIB </span> Old New I1,3,6; O3
27 USC-44 Old X
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-327" href="#section-327">327</a> USC-ECL </span> Old X
37 CCA-TENEX Old X
40 PARC-MAXC Old New I1,3,6; O3
43 UCSD-CC Old New I0(!),3; O0,3
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-344" href="#section-344">344</a> HAWAII-500 </span> ? ?
52 LONDON Old* X
53 OFFICE-1 Old X
54 MIT-MULTICS New New None
61 BBN-TENEXB Old New I1,3,6; O3
<span class="h2"><a class="selflink" id="section-162" href="#section-162">162</a> BBN-TENEXD </span> Old New I1,3,6; O3
<span class="grey">Dodds [Page 2]</span><span id="page-3" ></span>
<span class="grey"><a href="./rfc669">RFC 669</a> Survey of New-Protocol TELNET Servers December 1974</span>
Key: X No server at this socket
? Status not ascertained -- unable to connect to host
I# Option # implemented incoming to user (Server says "Will #")
O# Option # implemented outgoing from user (Server says "Do #")
(# is option number in new Protocol. All options implemented
by anyone are:
0 Transmit-Binary
1 Echo
3 Suppress-Go-Ahead
6 Timing-Mark )
Note: * These servers return improper responses to some TELNET option
requests.
[ This RFC was put into machine readable form for entry ]
[ into the online RFC archives by Alex McKenzie with ]
[ support from GTE, formerly BBN Corp. 2/2000 ]
Dodds [Page 3]
Annotations
Select text to annotate